HOPE PRESBYTERIAN v. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

072707E2; A139430.

255 P.3d 645 (2011)

242 Or. App. 485

HOPE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ROGUE RIVER, a domestic nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (U.S.A.) and Presbytery of the Cascades, a domestic nonprofit corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 27, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Ethan Lumish , California, argued the cause for appellants. On the opening brief were James A. Wallan , and Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell, LLP. With them on the reply brief were Yen P. Nguyen , Douglas Ethan Lumish , and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.

James R. Dole , argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cauble, Dole, Sorenson & Ransom, LLP.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and LANDAU, Judge Pro Tempore.


LANDAU, J. Pro Tempore.

This is a dispute between a church, the Hope Presbyterian Church of Rogue River (Hope Presbyterian or plaintiff), and the denomination from which it seeks to separate, the Presbyterian Church (USA) (PCUSA) and its regional presbytery, the Presbytery of the Cascades (collectively, defendants). At issue is the ownership of the real and personal property—including a church building and its contents—to which Hope Presbyterian

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases